Do either of the major parties' housing policies actually make sense?
It's clear the big two don't care if the experts call their policies dumb.
This article has been syndicated from our national masthead, the National Account. Read more here.
š” Why it matters: Despite bold campaign promises, the major partiesā housing policies could do more to inflate prices than fix affordability.
š§ Whatās happening:
The Coalition and Labor are both pitching big housing plans ahead of the election.
Each party claims to support first home buyers ā but economists warn their proposals will actually push prices higher.
š The good: Supply-side solutions
Both parties acknowledge the need to build more homes:
Coalition: $5 billion infrastructure fund to help councils build roads, sewerage, and power for new developments.
Labor: $10 billion plan to build 100,000 new homes, exclusively for first-home buyers.
Yes, but: While helpful, these are longer-term plays. And the policies making waves are the ones that give people more cash to throw into an overheated market.
š The bad: Demand-boosting giveaways
Coalition
Let first home buyers access up to $50,000 from super for a deposit.
Allow mortgage interest tax deductions on newly built homes.
ā ļø Problem: That $50K could be worth $500,000 at retirement if left in super (based on 8% compound annual returns over a 30 year period).
ā ļø Higher-income earners benefit most from tax deductions.
Labor:
Let first home buyers purchase with just a 5% deposit.
ā ļø Problem: Risky lending. Critics warn it wonāt ease demand and increases financial exposure for the government.
š What the experts say:
CoreLogicās Tim Lawless estimates these policies could lift house prices by at least 5%. As a āconservative guess.ā
Economist Chris Richardson calls it a ādumpster fire of dumbā, arguing itās the classic mistake: more money chasing the same number of homes.
š¤ The spin:
At the ABC debate, both leaders dodged questions about price pressures, focusing instead on supply.
Dutton rolled out his son to talk about housing struggles ā while quietly admitting Dutton Jr. will rely on the Bank of Mum and Dad.
Albanese continues spruiking the benefits, downplaying inflationary risks.
š¬ The bottom line:
Australiaās housing crisis isnāt just about access ā itās about policy choices. Right now, both major parties are betting on popularity over prudence. And young Australians dreaming of homeownership? Theyāre left hoping for more than just good intentions.